A reviewing court must analyze how a reasonable juror might have interpreted the instruction and pay "careful attention to the words actually spoken to the jury," Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 514 (1979) (citation omitted); see also Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307, 322 (1985) ("Language that merely contradicts and does not explain a constitutionally infirm instruction will not suffice to absolve the infirmity.").
For subscription based briefing and sample instructions on this and related issues see:
Forecite National™
Forecite California™
