Greetings

Welcome to The Forecite Blog™ -- Criminal Jury Instructions Prepared by Tom Lundy. This is a blog about criminal jury instructions from the defense perspective. The goal of the blog is to highlight recent state and federal cases which suggest issues and strategies relevant to jury instruction practice. The blog will also include selected sample instructions from recent cases.

Best Regards,
Thomas F. Lundy
Editor in Chief
Forecite National
Forecite California

Disclaimer: Legal opinions on The Forecite Blog™ are provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed lawyer. The Forecite Blog™ does not warrant that the information is complete or accurate.

Citation Caveat: Many of the opinions cited in this blog are not yet final or are unpublished. Therefore you should not cite or rely on any judicial decision referenced in The Forecite Blog™ without independently verifying the opinion's status as citable precedent. The rules of the applicable jurisdiction should be consulted before citing to an unpublished opinion or relying on it as precedent.

Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012 Thomas F. Lundy. All Rights Reserved. E-mail tlundy@juryinstruction.com for permissions.

Friday, April 29, 2011

Judge’s Duty To Consider Non-Standard/Pattern Instructions (Florida)

“Using ‘standard jury instructions does not relieve the trial court of its obligation to determine whether the standard instructions accurately and adequately state the law.’ Id. If the trial court determines that the instruction is ‘erroneous or inadequate,’ the court may then modify the standard jury instruction as the "trial judge shall determine to be necessary to instruct the jury accurately and sufficiently. [Citation.]" Peters v. State, 33 So. 3d 812, 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist., No. 4D08‑3299, 4/28/2010).

For subscription based briefing and sample instructions on this and related issues see:

Forecite NationalÔ

Forecite CaliforniaÔ