Greetings

Welcome to The Forecite Blog™ -- Criminal Jury Instructions Prepared by Tom Lundy. This is a blog about criminal jury instructions from the defense perspective. The goal of the blog is to highlight recent state and federal cases which suggest issues and strategies relevant to jury instruction practice. The blog will also include selected sample instructions from recent cases.

Best Regards,
Thomas F. Lundy
Editor in Chief
Forecite National
Forecite California

Disclaimer: Legal opinions on The Forecite Blog™ are provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed lawyer. The Forecite Blog™ does not warrant that the information is complete or accurate.

Citation Caveat: Many of the opinions cited in this blog are not yet final or are unpublished. Therefore you should not cite or rely on any judicial decision referenced in The Forecite Blog™ without independently verifying the opinion's status as citable precedent. The rules of the applicable jurisdiction should be consulted before citing to an unpublished opinion or relying on it as precedent.

Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012 Thomas F. Lundy. All Rights Reserved. E-mail tlundy@juryinstruction.com for permissions.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Judge’s Duty To Answer Juror Questions About The Instructions: Reciting Already Given Instructions Is Not Sufficient (6th Circuit)

It is not enough for the trial court to recite the instructions already given. United States v. Nunez, 889 F.2d 1564, 1568 (6th Cir. 1989). The district court has a duty "to clear up uncertainties that the jury brings to the court's attention." Id. (quoting United States v. Giacalone, 588 F.2d 1158, 1166 (6th Cir. 1978)).  In other words, the district court should “not merely reiterate the original instructions.” United States v. Robinson, (6th Cir. Ky., No. 08-5939, 2009). [Notice: This opinion is UNPUBLISHED.]